Upcoming Games for December 19, 2025
| Time | Teams | Win | Best ML | Best Spread | Points | Total Points | Best O/U | More Details | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota State Jackrabbits (7-6) Wisconsin Milwaukee Panthers (4-6) | 55.0% 45.0% | -130 +120 -115 +115 | -2-110 +1½+103 -1-110 +2-105 | 78.3 76.4 | 154.7 | o152-103 u152-115 o151-110 u152-110 | All Bet Values Active | ||
| Grambling State Tigers (4-6) Hampton Pirates (6-6) | 47.5% 52.5% | -105 +100 +100 -115 | +1-110 +1-106 +1½-110 +0-110 | 68.0 69.1 | 137.1 | o138-110 u138½-112 o137½-110 u138½-110 | Volatility Bet Value Active | ||
| Coppin State Eagles (2-12) Navy Midshipmen (6-5) | 2.2% 97.8% | +1900 -4500 | +20½-110 -20½-105 +21-109 -21-109 | 58.1 81.2 | 139.3 | o145½-104 u145½-110 o145-110 u146-110 | |||
| Seton Hall Pirates (10-1) Providence Friars (7-5) | 50.3% 49.7% | -105 -110 +100 -105 | +1-110 +0-110 +1-110 +1-110 | 75.5 75.3 | 150.8 | o152½-110 u153-105 o151½-110 u153½-110 | Volatility Bet Value Active | ||
| Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers (3-8) Drexel Dragons (4-7) | 27.4% 72.6% | +186 -220 +185 -200 | +5-105 -5-110 +5-109 -4½-110 | 66.3 73.3 | 139.6 | o140½-110 u140½-110 o139½-110 u140½-110 | |||
| La Salle Explorers (4-7) High Point Panthers (9-3) | 9.3% 90.7% | +725 -1300 +700 -1050 | +13½-105 -13-112 +13½-109 -13½-109 | 69.2 82.5 | 151.7 | o148-105 u149-110 o148½-110 u149-110 | |||
| MS Valley State Delta Devils (1-10) Florida State Seminoles (5-6) | 0.1% 99.9% | +39½-110 -39-115 +39½-110 -39-110 | 58.2 101.4 | 159.6 | o163½-110 u164½-110 o162½-110 u164½-110 | All Bet Values Active | |||
| Eastern Michigan Eagles (6-5) Akron Zips (8-3) | 7.4% 92.6% | +910 -1600 +950 -1500 | +15½-108 -15-110 +15-109 -15-109 | 74.2 89.2 | 163.4 | o156-110 u156-110 o156-110 u156½-110 | |||
| Norfolk State Spartans (4-8) Jackson State Tigers (1-10) | 65.0% 35.0% | -220 +186 -215 +200 | -5-110 +5½-110 -5-110 +6-110 | 72.9 68.1 | 141.0 | o138½-110 u139½-110 o138-110 u139½-110 | |||
| Tulsa Golden Hurricane (10-1) Western Kentucky Hilltoppers (7-3) | 59.4% 40.6% | -130 +120 -135 +125 | -2-109 +2½-112 -2½-105 +2½-109 | 80.6 77.5 | 158.1 | o158-107 u158-105 o157½-110 u157½-110 | |||
| Villanova Wildcats (8-2) Wisconsin Badgers (7-3) | 38.6% 61.4% | +160 -180 +160 -180 | +4-109 -4-110 +4-109 -4-109 | 74.9 78.6 | 153.5 | o151½-107 u151½-110 o151-110 u152½-110 | |||
| Alcorn State Braves (1-9) Baylor Bears (7-2) | 0.3% 99.7% | +36-110 -35-110 +36-110 -35-110 | 60.9 97.4 | 158.3 | o160-115 u160-105 o160½-110 u161-110 | ||||
| Florida A&M Rattlers (3-5) Tarleton State Texans (8-4) | 9.7% 90.3% | +800 -1600 +800 -1250 | +14½-110 -14½+100 +14½-109 -14-110 | 67.1 80.3 | 147.4 | o146-110 u147-110 o145½-110 u146-110 | Overall Bet Value Active | ||
| Southeastern Louisiana Lions (4-7) LSU Tigers (9-1) | 1.0% 99.0% | +24-105 -23½-115 +24-109 -24-109 | 59.0 87.3 | 146.3 | o144½-105 u144½-110 o144-110 u144-110 | ||||
| Belmont Bruins (11-1) UC Irvine Anteaters (7-4) | 50.3% 49.7% | +115 -130 +110 -120 | +1½-105 -2-105 +2-110 -1-110 | 75.0 74.9 | 149.9 | o150½-110 u151½-106 o151-110 u151½-110 | |||
| Abilene Christian Wildcats (7-4) Brigham Young Cougars (10-1) | 0.6% 99.4% | +33-110 -33-105 +33-109 -33-109 | 57.9 88.1 | 146.0 | o144-110 u144-105 o143½-110 u144½-110 | ||||
| Cal Poly Mustangs (5-7) UCLA Bruins (8-3) | 0.9% 99.1% | +24½+100 -24½-115 +25-109 -24½-110 | 65.3 94.0 | 159.3 | o160½-110 u160½-110 o161-110 u162-110 | ||||
| San Diego Toreros (4-6) UC San Diego Tritons (10-1) | 9.1% 90.9% | +945 -1000 +900 -1200 | +13½-110 -13½+100 +14-109 -13½-110 | 68.9 82.2 | 151.1 | o155½-102 u155½-108 o154½-110 u155½-110 | Overall Bet Value Active Overall Bet Value Active | ||
| Florida Atlantic (8-3) Saint Mary's College Gaels (9-2) | 8.8% 91.2% | +775 -1200 +800 -1200 | +13½-105 -13½-108 +14-109 -13½-110 | 66.0 79.7 | 145.7 | o145-115 u146-110 o146-110 u146-110 | |||
| North Alabama Lions (5-5) Loyola Marymount Lions (7-4) | 12.9% 87.1% | +390 -550 +425 -525 | +9½-110 -9-110 +9½-109 -9½-109 | 65.1 76.6 | 141.7 | o140½-110 u141-110 o140-110 u141-110 | |||
| Morgan State Bears (2-8) California Golden Bears (10-1) | 0.3% 99.7% | +26½-105 -26½-110 +26½-109 -26½-109 | 59.5 94.7 | 154.2 | o151-110 u151½-110 o150-110 u150-110 | ||||
| Seattle Redhawks (9-2) Washington Huskies (7-3) | 20.2% 79.8% | +274 +255 +280 -310 | +7½-110 +8-118 +7-109 -7-109 | 69.7 78.6 | 148.3 | o148½-115 u149½-110 o149-110 u149½-110 | All Bet Values Active |
Completed Games
| Time | Teams | Win | Best ML | Best Spread | Final Points | Sportsbook Log Loss | DRatings Log Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana Tech Bulldogs Georgia Southern Eagles | 51.9% 48.1% | +110 -125 +110 -130 | +1½-105 -1½-110 +2-109 -2-109 | 69 77 | -0.61904-0.61112 | -0.73147 | |
| Harvard Crimson UMass Minutemen | 33.2% 66.8% | +210 -240 +220 -250 | +6-110 -5½-116 +6-109 -6-109 | 71 78 | -0.37637-0.36291 | -0.40317 | |
| Florida Gulf Coast Eagles FIU Golden Panthers | 54.9% 45.1% | -120 +100 -120 +110 | -1½-105 +1½-110 -1-110 +1½-109 | 83 89 | -0.73760-0.76336 | -0.79622 | |
| New Hampshire Wildcats Dartmouth Big Green | 10.5% 89.5% | +390 -550 +375 -435 | +9-105 -8½-110 +9-110 -8½-109 | 68 69 | -0.21607-0.23026 | -0.11119 | |
| Wright State Raiders Youngstown State Penguins | 38.2% 61.8% | +151 -170 +165 -180 | +4-105 -3½-115 +4-109 -4-109 | 68 69 | -0.49027-0.46185 | -0.48094 | |
| Northeastern Huskies Holy Cross Crusaders | 71.3% 28.7% | -370 +285 -330 +310 | -8-110 +8-110 -8-109 +8½-110 | 59 76 | -1.39396-1.42225 | -1.24803 | |
| Ark Pine Bluff Golden Lions UIC Flames | 5.8% 94.2% | +1200 -1550 | +17½-112 -15½-115 +16½-109 -16-110 | 63 62 | -2.58111 | -2.84835 | |
| Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles Lipscomb Bisons | 19.4% 80.6% | +410 -510 +450 -525 | +11-110 -10½-107 +11-110 -10-110 | 80 83 | -0.21068-0.19594 | -0.21594 | |
| Saint Louis Billikens Loyola Marymount Lions | 69.3% 30.7% | -325 +265 -310 +265 | -8-105 +8½-115 -7½-109 +7½-109 | 91 70 | -0.30621-0.30921 | -0.36742 | |
| USC Trojans Oregon Ducks | 50.9% 49.1% | -150 +130 -140 +140 | -2½-110 +2½-103 -3+100 +2½-109 | 82 77 | -0.54502-0.53900 | -0.67464 | |
| Utah Utes California Golden Bears | 22.6% 77.4% | +310 -385 +330 -370 | +8½-110 -8-105 +8½-109 -8½-109 | 72 79 | -0.26793-0.25884 | -0.25613 | |
| UC San Diego Tritons Nevada Wolf Pack | 39.9% 60.1% | +210 -245 +230 -255 | +6-110 -5½-110 +6-109 -6-109 | 70 76 | -0.37449-0.35197 | -0.50954 | |
| UNC Tar Heels Kentucky Wildcats | 31.9% 68.1% | +240 -290 +250 -270 | +7-103 -7-105 +7-109 -6½-110 | 67 64 | -1.26079-1.26808 | -1.14109 | |
| Connecticut Huskies Kansas Jayhawks | 57.8% 42.2% | -135 +135 -140 +125 | -2-110 +3+102 -2-110 +3-110 | 61 56 | -0.55431-0.56639 | -0.54790 | |
| Georgia Bulldogs Florida State Seminoles | 64.8% 35.2% | +105 -118 +105 -120 | +1½-110 -1-110 +1½-109 -1-110 | 107 73 | -0.74651-0.75056 | -0.43354 | |
| Abilene Christian Wildcats Pepperdine Waves | 52.0% 48.0% | -115 +100 +105 +100 | +0-116 +1-110 +1½-110 +1-109 | 71 63 | -0.66000-0.70558 | -0.65314 |
Season Prediction Results
| Games | Record (Pct) | No Pick | +/- | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sportsbooks | 27 | 14-8 (0.611) | 5 | -0.59120 | |
| Sportsbooks | 27 | 17-8 (0.667) | 2 | -0.53203 | |
| DRatings | 27 | 21-6 (0.778) | 0 | -0.50822 | 0.08298 0.02381 |
Predictions Methodology
Below are our projections for all of the games in college basketball today. The projections that we provide are now at a “Level 3” (see more at our predictions disclaimer for details). Our proprietary algorithm takes a variety of factors into account that are all predictive in projecting the winner and score.
Note that we are an information site, and this information should be used for entertainment purposes only.
Related Blog Posts
Randomness, Edge, and Volume in Sports Betting Outcomes
We dig into the data behind variance and expectation.
Top 5 Sweepstakes Sportsbooks
Find out who makes our top five sweepstakes sportsbook list.
2025-2026 NFL Season Preview
Here is our 2025-2026 NFL season preview based on 1,000 simulations.
The Predictive Power of Prediction Markets
Discover how prediction markets deliver accurate forecasts.
Creating a Ratings Model with Bradley-Terry
Modeling with the Bradley-Terry model in Python