Upcoming Games for December 22, 2025
| Time | Teams | Win | Best ML | Best Spread | Points | Total Points | Best O/U | More Details | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Haven Chargers (5-6) Fordham Rams (8-4) | 11.6% 88.4% | +11½-110 -11½-110 | 61.9 73.7 | 135.6 | o128½-115 u128½-105 | ||||
| NJIT Highlanders (4-8) Butler Bulldogs (9-3) | 0.4% 99.6% | +32-110 -32-110 | 58.1 90.8 | 148.9 | o149½-110 u149½-110 | ||||
| Sacred Heart Pioneers (5-7) Towson Tigers (7-5) | 9.9% 90.1% | +11-115 -10½-110 +10½-110 -10½-110 | 66.2 79.3 | 145.5 | o146½-110 u147-110 o148-110 u148-110 | ||||
| West Georgia Wolves (6-5) Georgia Bulldogs (10-1) | 0.8% 99.2% | +36-110 -36-110 | 65.1 94.2 | 159.3 | o164½-110 u164½-110 | ||||
| Seattle Redhawks (10-2) UTSA Roadrunners (4-7) | 87.5% 12.5% | -8-110 +8½-110 -8½-110 +8½-110 | 79.2 67.7 | 146.9 | o143½-104 u144-110 o143½-110 u144½-110 | ||||
| Denver Pioneers (7-7) Tulsa Golden Hurricane (11-1) | 5.9% 94.1% | +18-110 -18-110 +18½-110 -18-110 | 69.9 86.2 | 156.1 | o164½-110 u166-115 o165½-110 u166½-110 | ||||
| South Carolina State Bulldogs (1-12) South Carolina Gamecocks (7-4) | 0.7% 99.3% | +31½-110 -31½-110 | 59.6 89.6 | 149.2 | o145½-110 u145½-110 | ||||
| SIU Edwardsville Cougars (7-5) Western Illinois Leathernecks (4-8) | 76.9% 23.1% | -5-109 +5½-110 -5-110 +5½-110 | 73.3 65.2 | 138.5 | o136-110 u136-110 o136½-110 u137½-110 | ||||
| Portland Pilots (7-5) UC Santa Barbara Gauchos (8-4) | 22.9% 77.1% | +9-110 -9-110 +9-110 -9-110 | 72.8 81.0 | 153.8 | o152-105 u152-115 o151-110 u151½-110 | ||||
| Abilene Christian Wildcats (7-5) Texas Southern Tigers (1-8) | 77.1% 22.9% | -4½-110 +4½-110 | 77.6 69.4 | 147.0 | o145-110 u145-110 | ||||
| American University Eagles (7-5) Virginia Cavaliers (10-1) | 1.5% 98.5% | +27-110 -27-110 | 58.5 84.4 | 142.9 | o154-110 u154-110 | ||||
| Siena Saints (9-3) Indiana Hoosiers (9-3) | 2.5% 97.5% | +23½+100 -23½-105 +23½-110 -23½-110 | 61.0 83.3 | 144.3 | o144-105 u144½-110 o143½-110 u143½-110 | ||||
| Coppin State Eagles (2-13) Georgetown Hoyas (8-4) | 0.2% 99.8% | +31-110 -31-110 | 53.0 92.2 | 145.2 | o148½-110 u148½-110 | ||||
| Prairie View A&M Panthers (5-6) LSU Tigers (10-1) | 0.3% 99.7% | +29½-105 -29½-115 | 62.2 97.2 | 159.4 | o157½-110 u157½-110 | ||||
| Fairleigh Dickinson Knights (3-8) Boston College Eagles (5-6) | 2.2% 97.8% | +17½-110 -17½-110 | 59.8 82.9 | 142.7 | o141½-110 u141½-110 | ||||
| Stonehill Skyhawks (3-9) Syracuse Orange (8-4) | 0.4% 99.6% | +23½-110 -23½-110 | 53.8 86.6 | 140.4 | o139-110 u139-110 | ||||
| Jacksonville Dolphins (5-7) Florida State Seminoles (6-6) | 3.5% 96.5% | +24½-108 -24½-112 | 68.0 87.8 | 155.8 | o156½-110 u156½-110 | ||||
| MS Valley State Delta Devils (1-11) West Virginia Mountaineers (8-4) | 0.0% 100.0% | 44.6 94.2 | 138.8 | o135½-110 u135½-110 | |||||
| Bryant Bulldogs (3-9) High Point Panthers (10-3) | 3.3% 96.7% | +17½-115 -17½-105 | 66.1 86.3 | 152.4 | o153½-110 u153½-110 | ||||
| Princeton Tigers (3-10) Temple Owls (7-5) | 13.1% 86.9% | +11½-115 -11-105 +11½-110 -11-110 | 67.0 78.3 | 145.3 | o143-110 u143-110 o143-110 u143-110 | ||||
| Rider Broncs (1-9) VCU Rams (8-4) | 0.1% 99.9% | +31-110 -31-110 +31-110 -31-110 | 49.8 92.6 | 142.4 | o143½-110 u143½-110 o143½-110 u143½-110 | ||||
| Eastern Michigan Eagles (6-6) Wright State Raiders (5-7) | 26.8% 73.2% | +6½-105 -6½-115 +7-110 -6½-110 | 72.7 79.9 | 152.6 | o138½-110 u138½-110 o138½-110 u138½-110 | ||||
| Coastal Carolina Chanticleers (7-6) Saint Joseph's Hawks (7-4) | 18.2% 81.8% | +8½-110 -8½-110 +8½-110 -8½-110 | 67.8 77.4 | 145.2 | o142-115 u142-105 o142½-110 u142½-110 | ||||
| Canisius Golden Griffins (5-7) Duquesne Dukes (6-5) | 5.6% 94.4% | +20½-110 -20-115 +20½-110 -20½-110 | 61.4 77.9 | 139.3 | o143½-110 u143½-110 o142½-110 u143-110 | ||||
| Northeastern Huskies (4-6) Rhode Island Rams (8-4) | 9.5% 90.5% | +10½-110 -10½-105 +11-110 -10½-110 | 65.2 78.4 | 143.6 | o143½-115 u145½-115 o144½-110 u145-110 | ||||
| Illinois Fighting Illini (8-3) Missouri Tigers (10-2) | 88.0% 12.0% | -9-110 +9-110 -9-110 +9-110 | 87.4 75.8 | 163.2 | o155½-110 u155½-110 o155½-110 u155½-110 | ||||
| Central Michigan Chippewas (4-8) Wisconsin Badgers (7-4) | 0.8% 99.2% | +31-105 -30½-110 +31-110 -30½-110 | 62.7 92.1 | 154.8 | o156½-110 u156½-110 o156½-110 u156½-110 | ||||
| IUPUI Jaguars (4-9) Grand Canyon Antelopes (7-4) | 2.3% 97.7% | +25½-105 -25½-110 +25½-110 -25½-110 | 74.0 96.7 | 170.7 | o168-110 u168-110 o168½-110 u168½-110 | ||||
| Davidson Wildcats (8-3) Kansas Jayhawks (9-3) | 3.7% 96.3% | +17½-110 -17½-110 +18-110 -17½-110 | 60.5 79.9 | 140.4 | o137-110 u137-110 o138-110 u138½-110 | ||||
| Utah Tech Trailblazers (7-6) Creighton Bluejays (7-5) | 2.1% 97.9% | +19½-110 -19½-110 +19½-110 -19½-110 | 64.4 87.8 | 152.2 | o145-110 u145-110 o145-110 u145½-110 | ||||
| Alabama State Hornets (3-8) Memphis Tigers (4-7) | 2.9% 97.1% | +18½-110 -18½-110 | 67.1 88.3 | 155.4 | o147½-115 u147½-105 | ||||
| MD E Shore Fighting Hawks (4-12) Texas Longhorns (8-4) | 0.3% 99.7% | +33-105 -33-115 | 51.5 88.6 | 140.1 | o140½-110 u140½-110 | ||||
| UT Arlington Mavericks (7-4) Oral Roberts Golden Eagles (5-9) | 67.4% 32.6% | -2-110 +2-110 -2-110 +2½-110 | 79.0 73.5 | 152.5 | o140½-110 u140½-110 o140½-110 u141-110 | Overall Bet Value Active | |||
| East Carolina Pirates (5-7) UNC Tar Heels (11-1) | 0.7% 99.3% | +28-110 -27½-110 +28-110 -27½-110 | 59.4 89.3 | 148.7 | o144½-110 u144½-110 o144½-110 u144½-110 | ||||
| Bethune Cookman Wildcats (3-8) Arizona Wildcats (11-0) | 0.1% 99.9% | +39½-110 -39½-110 | 56.3 100.5 | 156.8 | o150½-110 u150½-110 | ||||
| Stetson Hatters (4-8) Oklahoma Sooners (8-3) | 0.4% 99.6% | +30-110 -30-110 | 62.6 94.9 | 157.5 | o149-110 u149-110 | ||||
| Eastern Washington Eagles (2-10) Brigham Young Cougars (11-1) | 0.2% 99.8% | +36-110 -35½-115 +36-110 -35½-110 | 58.0 98.7 | 156.7 | o161½-110 u161½-110 o161½-110 u161½-110 | ||||
| Northern Iowa Panthers (9-2) Saint Mary's College Gaels (10-2) | 11.9% 88.1% | +11½-105 -11½-110 +12-110 -11½-110 | 61.7 73.5 | 135.2 | o131-105 u131-115 o132-110 u132-110 | Overall Bet Value Active | |||
| Sacramento State Hornets (4-7) Cal State Northridge Matadors (7-5) | 22.5% 77.5% | +10½-115 -10-110 +10-110 -10-110 | 73.3 81.8 | 155.1 | o161-110 u161-110 o161-110 u161½-110 | ||||
| San Diego Toreros (5-6) Washington Huskies (7-4) | 3.4% 96.6% | +20½-110 -20-110 +20-110 -19½-110 | 67.0 86.9 | 153.9 | o156½-110 u156½-110 o156½-110 u156½-110 |
Games In Progress
Completed Games
| Time | Teams | Win | Best ML | Best Spread | Final Points | Sportsbook Log Loss | DRatings Log Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seton Hall Pirates USC Trojans | 24.3% 75.7% | +225 -240 +220 -240 | +6-110 -5-110 +6-110 -5-109 | 81 83 | -0.36179-0.36652 | -0.27848 | |
| Ohio Bobcats Loyola Marymount Lions | 40.8% 59.2% | +150 -165 +150 -160 | +3½-110 -3½-105 +3½-109 -3-110 | 58 70 | -0.49617-0.50078 | -0.52454 | |
| UC San Diego Tritons Bradley University Braves | 53.6% 46.4% | +105 -120 +105 -120 | +1½-110 -1½-108 +1½-109 -1-110 | 87 77 | -0.75056-0.75056 | -0.62412 | |
| MTSU Blue Raiders McNeese State Cowboys | 21.9% 78.1% | +345 -445 +395 -450 | +9½-115 -9-110 +9½-109 -7½-110 | 62 72 | -0.24312-0.22067 | -0.24705 | |
| Kennesaw State Owls Oral Roberts Golden Eagles | 83.6% 16.4% | -425 +337 -375 +350 | -8½-110 +8½-109 -8-110 +8½-109 | 83 91 | -1.51240-1.51572 | -1.80679 | |
| St. John's Red Storm Baylor Bears | 68.1% 31.9% | -260 +220 -260 +245 | -6½-105 +6½-110 -6-109 +6½-110 | 96 81 | -0.35955-0.33743 | -0.38446 | |
| UTEP Miners UAB Blazers | 27.2% 72.8% | +300 -370 +330 -390 | +8-110 -8-109 +8-109 -8-109 | 59 75 | -0.27579-0.25634 | -0.31770 | |
| Northern Iowa Panthers Loyola Chicago Ramblers | 67.6% 32.4% | -335 +270 -340 +280 | -7-103 +7-110 -7-109 +7-109 | 72 51 | -0.30081-0.29308 | -0.39103 | |
| Kansas Jayhawks Syracuse Orange | 82.3% 17.7% | -200 +174 -190 +190 | -4½-110 +5-110 -4-110 +5-109 | 71 60 | -0.43660-0.42286 | -0.19443 | |
| Samford Bulldogs Georgia State Panthers | 69.0% 31.0% | -270 +235 -260 +230 | -6½-110 +6½-110 -6-110 +6½-109 | 78 63 | -0.34293-0.35037 | -0.37177 | |
| NC State Wolfpack Boise State Broncos | 61.2% 38.8% | -280 +245 -280 +240 | -6½-110 +6½-105 -6-110 +7-109 | 81 70 | -0.33173-0.33588 | -0.49107 | |
| Rhode Island Rams Vermont Catamounts | 68.1% 31.9% | -230 +203 -240 +215 | -5½-110 +5½-109 -5½-109 +6-110 | 80 65 | -0.38765-0.37138 | -0.38463 | |
| Texas A&M Commerce Lions Army Black Knights | 64.5% 35.5% | -150 +130 -145 +140 | -2½-103 +3-110 -2½-109 +3½-110 | 84 67 | -0.54502-0.53299 | -0.43776 | |
| Iowa State Cyclones Creighton Bluejays | 70.4% 29.6% | -240 +226 -240 +230 | -5-110 +5-107 -5-109 +5½-110 | 78 60 | -0.36086-0.35718 | -0.35041 | |
| Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens UNC Greensboro Spartans | 55.7% 44.3% | +112 -130 +115 -130 | +2-105 -2-110 +2-109 -2-109 | 73 60 | -0.78768-0.79536 | -0.58444 | |
| San Jose State Spartans Tulsa Golden Hurricane | 46.5% 53.5% | +195 -225 +200 -220 | +4½-101 -5-105 +5-109 -5-109 | 51 81 | -0.39854-0.39531 | -0.62502 |
Season Prediction Results
| Games | Record (Pct) | No Pick | +/- | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sportsbooks | 51 | 31-7 (0.735) | 13 | -0.46229 | |
| Sportsbooks | 51 | 33-7 (0.755) | 11 | -0.43539 | |
| DRatings | 51 | 47-4 (0.922) | 0 | -0.34163 | 0.12067 0.09376 |
Predictions Methodology
Below are our projections for all of the games in college basketball today. The projections that we provide are now at a “Level 3” (see more at our predictions disclaimer for details). Our proprietary algorithm takes a variety of factors into account that are all predictive in projecting the winner and score.
Note that we are an information site, and this information should be used for entertainment purposes only.
Related Blog Posts
Randomness, Edge, and Volume in Sports Betting Outcomes
We dig into the data behind variance and expectation.
Top 5 Sweepstakes Sportsbooks
Find out who makes our top five sweepstakes sportsbook list.
2025-2026 NFL Season Preview
Here is our 2025-2026 NFL season preview based on 1,000 simulations.
The Predictive Power of Prediction Markets
Discover how prediction markets deliver accurate forecasts.
Creating a Ratings Model with Bradley-Terry
Modeling with the Bradley-Terry model in Python